Anecdotal Evidence Is Not Evidence - Issue 09-2025

X said it that way, or Y thinks it's not accessible: This is a statement we hear frequently. It's called anecdotal evidence because far-reaching conclusions are drawn from individual experiences. However, especially in accessibility, this can lead to incorrect conclusions. Personal experiences are certainly important. However, one should always be cautious when applying them. It's always a good idea to consult experts or do your own research. If there are no valid sources or confirmations, one should be cautious when applying such anecdotes in practice.

Interesting Articles

As a side effect of the European Accessibility Act (EAA), poor-quality information on accessibility is increasing. This article shows what you should pay attention to.

Recognizing poor information on digital accessibility

What frustrates Accessibility Consultants

A recent book explores the practical side of inclusive design.

Inclusive Design for Accessibility: A practical guide to digital accessibility, UX, and inclusive

A new publication addresses the ethical aspects of AI for sign language.

New EUD Publications on Artificial Intelligence and Sign Language

A recommendation shows how the WCAG can be applied on Non-web content.pplied.

Guidance on Applying WCAG 2 to Non-Web Information and Communications Technologies (WCAG2IC)

A self-test helps determine the accessibility maturity level in the organization.

Accessibility Maturity Snapshot BETA

A study shows how a lack of accessibility can ruin your holiday.

77 percent of disabled people say venue websites provide confusing or inaccurate Details